John Locke Essays -- Empiricists, Empiricism

seat Locke believes that troops ought to have more freedom in political ordination than John Stuart lounge does. John Lockes The Second Treatise of Government and John Stuart hang arounds On Liberty argon influential and potent literary works which bit outlining the conceptual framework of each psyches ideal differentiate present dickens divergent visions of the very nature of man and his freedom. John Locke and John Stuart mill around have different views regarding how much freedom man ought to have in political party because they have different views regarding mans basic potential for inherently good or evil behavior, as well as the ends or aim of political societies. In order to examine how each thinker views man and the freedom he ought to have in political society it is necessary to define freedom or liberty from each philosophers perspective. In The Second Treatise of Government, John Locke states his belief that all men exist in "a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and mortal as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking provide or depending upon the will of all other man. " (Locke 4) Locke believes that man exists in a state of nature and thus exists in a state of ungovernable liberty which has only the law of nature to restrict it, which is reason. (Locke 5) However Locke does state that man does not have the license to destroy himself or any other creature in his possession unless a legitimate purpose requires it. Locke emphasizes the ability and opportunity to own and profit from property as organism necessary to be free. In On Liberty John Stuart Mill defines liberty in relation to three line of businesss each successive celestial sphere progressively encompasses and defines more elements relating to political society. The first sphere consists of the individuals "inward vault of heaven of consciousness demanding liberty of conscious in the mos t comprehensive nose out liberty of thought and feeling absolute freedom of opinion and design on all subjects, practical or speculative, scientific, moral, or theological." (Mill 13) The second sphere of Mills definition encompasses the general freedoms which allow an individual to freely peruse a "...life to suit our own character of doing as we like..." (Mill 13). Mill also states that these freedoms mustiness not be interfered with by "fellow crea... ...ave left an indelible find on the concept of freedom in political societies. John Locke favours great freedom for man in political society than does John Stuart Mill does. Their beliefs regarding the nature of man and the purpose of the state are bound to their single views regarding freedom because one position perpetuates and demands a conclusion regarding another. Locke system for transaction with man freedom and all other related matters severely limits the social occasion of state to strictly guarante eing individual freedom. This is the best method of preventing the perversion and debauch of the role and power of the state. Locke views simply stem from his faith in man and his potential to succeed independently, which collectively promotes the prosperity of the state. Mill does not implicitly trust or distrust man and therefore does not explicitly limit freedom, in fact he does define freedom in very liberal terms, however he does leave the potential for unmeasured intervention into the personal freedoms of the individual by the state. This nullifies any freedoms or rights individuals are said to have because they subject to the whims and fancy of the state. from ksampsonmustang.uwo.ca